Social Science Passages · Lesson 4

A social science passage at pace

On the test, a passage and its questions share one clock. Reading gives you 40 minutes for 36 questions, about 67 seconds per question including the time you spend reading, so a passage with nine questions is worth about 10 minutes. A plan keeps you from rereading the whole passage for every question.

Minutes 0 to 3: read once and map. Read at a steady pace and give each paragraph a tag and a few words: claim, evidence, or limit, plus who is speaking. Don’t stop to memorize details; the map tells you where they are.

Minutes 3 to 10: answer from the map. For each question, use the paragraph number or the named group to jump to the right paragraph, reread only the lines you need, say the answer in your own words, and then match a choice. If a big-picture question (main idea, the author’s view) comes first, it is fine to answer a few detail questions before it, since they sharpen your sense of the whole. If one question holds you past a minute and a half, choose your best answer, flag it, and move on.

Try the plan on the passage below. It has six paragraphs and weighs two explanations against each other, a common shape for social science passages.

Why the Milk Is in the Back

This passage is from an essay about how grocery stores came to be arranged the way they are.

1Ask a group of shoppers why the milk is almost always in the back corner of a grocery store, and most will give the same answer. The store, they say, wants you to walk past hundreds of other products on your way to the one thing you came for, in the hope that a box of crackers or a bag of oranges will find its way into your cart. It is a tidy explanation, and it has the appeal of seeming slightly sneaky. It is also, according to many people who have worked in the grocery business, only part of the story.

2Their version begins with the delivery truck. Milk arrives several times a week in large refrigerated loads, and every minute it spends out of the cold shortens the time it can stay on a shelf. A busy store may sell hundreds of gallons in a single day, so the cases must be refilled again and again. Most stores receive their deliveries at a loading dock in the back of the building, so placing the dairy cases along the back wall lets workers move milk from the truck to the walk-in cooler and then to the shelves with the shortest possible trip. Put the milk at the front, these insiders point out, and every crate would have to be wheeled through the length of the store, past shoppers and through the aisles.

3History supports the delivery account as well. Before the middle of the twentieth century, many grocery stores kept their goods behind a counter, and a clerk fetched each item a customer asked for. Layout hardly mattered to shoppers, who never walked the floor. When self-service stores spread, owners built them around the equipment they already needed, and the heavy refrigerated cases went where the deliveries came in. In some early self-service stores, the dairy case backed directly onto the cold storage room, so that clerks could restock it from behind without ever entering the sales floor. The placement, in other words, was settled for practical reasons before anyone had studied how shoppers move.

4That study came later, and it has given the popular explanation some real support. Researchers who track shoppers’ paths, sometimes by following them with a clipboard and sometimes by attaching small sensors to carts, have found that most people do not walk every aisle, even when they have plenty of time. Instead, they tend to circle the outer edge of the store, where fresh foods are usually kept, and dip into only a few of the center aisles. Shoppers who make a quick trip for one or two items often spend more than they planned, and stores are well aware of it. Some managers say that once they understood these patterns, they placed new products and seasonal displays along the route to the dairy case on purpose.

5So which explanation is right? The fairest answer is that the two describe different moments. The delivery account explains why milk ended up in the back in the first place; the shopping account explains why stores have little reason to move it now. A layout chosen for the convenience of workers turned out to suit the store’s sales as well, and a business seldom changes an arrangement that serves it twice.

6The case of the milk carries a broader lesson about explanations of this kind. When a pattern benefits someone, it is natural to assume it was designed for that benefit. Sometimes it was. Often, though, the benefit was discovered after the fact, and the pattern was first shaped by something far less interesting, such as where the trucks happened to park. Asking where a pattern began, and not only whom it helps, is often the quickest way to tell the two cases apart.

Worked example Medium

Show the whole passage

Why the Milk Is in the Back

This passage is from an essay about how grocery stores came to be arranged the way they are.

1Ask a group of shoppers why the milk is almost always in the back corner of a grocery store, and most will give the same answer. The store, they say, wants you to walk past hundreds of other products on your way to the one thing you came for, in the hope that a box of crackers or a bag of oranges will find its way into your cart. It is a tidy explanation, and it has the appeal of seeming slightly sneaky. It is also, according to many people who have worked in the grocery business, only part of the story.

2Their version begins with the delivery truck. Milk arrives several times a week in large refrigerated loads, and every minute it spends out of the cold shortens the time it can stay on a shelf. A busy store may sell hundreds of gallons in a single day, so the cases must be refilled again and again. Most stores receive their deliveries at a loading dock in the back of the building, so placing the dairy cases along the back wall lets workers move milk from the truck to the walk-in cooler and then to the shelves with the shortest possible trip. Put the milk at the front, these insiders point out, and every crate would have to be wheeled through the length of the store, past shoppers and through the aisles.

3History supports the delivery account as well. Before the middle of the twentieth century, many grocery stores kept their goods behind a counter, and a clerk fetched each item a customer asked for. Layout hardly mattered to shoppers, who never walked the floor. When self-service stores spread, owners built them around the equipment they already needed, and the heavy refrigerated cases went where the deliveries came in. In some early self-service stores, the dairy case backed directly onto the cold storage room, so that clerks could restock it from behind without ever entering the sales floor. The placement, in other words, was settled for practical reasons before anyone had studied how shoppers move.

4That study came later, and it has given the popular explanation some real support. Researchers who track shoppers’ paths, sometimes by following them with a clipboard and sometimes by attaching small sensors to carts, have found that most people do not walk every aisle, even when they have plenty of time. Instead, they tend to circle the outer edge of the store, where fresh foods are usually kept, and dip into only a few of the center aisles. Shoppers who make a quick trip for one or two items often spend more than they planned, and stores are well aware of it. Some managers say that once they understood these patterns, they placed new products and seasonal displays along the route to the dairy case on purpose.

5So which explanation is right? The fairest answer is that the two describe different moments. The delivery account explains why milk ended up in the back in the first place; the shopping account explains why stores have little reason to move it now. A layout chosen for the convenience of workers turned out to suit the store’s sales as well, and a business seldom changes an arrangement that serves it twice.

6The case of the milk carries a broader lesson about explanations of this kind. When a pattern benefits someone, it is natural to assume it was designed for that benefit. Sometimes it was. Often, though, the benefit was discovered after the fact, and the pattern was first shaped by something far less interesting, such as where the trucks happened to park. Asking where a pattern began, and not only whom it helps, is often the quickest way to tell the two cases apart.

Which choice best describes the overall argument of the passage about where stores put their milk?

  1. Grocery stores place milk in the back corner mainly so that shoppers will walk past other products and buy more than they planned.
  2. Researchers have found that most shoppers do not walk every aisle of a grocery store.
  3. Grocery stores once kept goods behind a counter, which meant that clerks, not shoppers, walked the store and fetched each item.
  4. Milk first went to the back of stores for delivery reasons, and its effect on shopping helps explain why it stays there.Answer

How to solve it

  1. Use the map: 1 popular claim (sales); 2 delivery account; 3 history backs delivery; 4 shopper studies back sales; 5 author: both, at different moments; 6 broader lesson.
  2. Join the notes: the placement began for deliveries and stays partly because it helps sales.
  3. D covers both halves. A, B, and C each match a single paragraph.

Why each choice is right or wrong

  • A. Incorrect. The idea that stores want shoppers to walk past other products is the shoppers’ explanation from paragraph 1, which the passage calls “only part of the story.”
  • B. Incorrect. That most shoppers skip many aisles is a true detail from paragraph 4, but it is too narrow. It supports one explanation and leaves out the delivery account.
  • C. Incorrect. The counter and the clerks are background from paragraph 3. They help explain the layout but are not the passage’s point.
  • D. Correct. Paragraph 5 joins the two accounts: “The delivery account explains why milk ended up in the back in the first place; the shopping account explains why stores have little reason to move it now.”

Worked example Hard

Show the whole passage

Why the Milk Is in the Back

This passage is from an essay about how grocery stores came to be arranged the way they are.

1Ask a group of shoppers why the milk is almost always in the back corner of a grocery store, and most will give the same answer. The store, they say, wants you to walk past hundreds of other products on your way to the one thing you came for, in the hope that a box of crackers or a bag of oranges will find its way into your cart. It is a tidy explanation, and it has the appeal of seeming slightly sneaky. It is also, according to many people who have worked in the grocery business, only part of the story.

2Their version begins with the delivery truck. Milk arrives several times a week in large refrigerated loads, and every minute it spends out of the cold shortens the time it can stay on a shelf. A busy store may sell hundreds of gallons in a single day, so the cases must be refilled again and again. Most stores receive their deliveries at a loading dock in the back of the building, so placing the dairy cases along the back wall lets workers move milk from the truck to the walk-in cooler and then to the shelves with the shortest possible trip. Put the milk at the front, these insiders point out, and every crate would have to be wheeled through the length of the store, past shoppers and through the aisles.

3History supports the delivery account as well. Before the middle of the twentieth century, many grocery stores kept their goods behind a counter, and a clerk fetched each item a customer asked for. Layout hardly mattered to shoppers, who never walked the floor. When self-service stores spread, owners built them around the equipment they already needed, and the heavy refrigerated cases went where the deliveries came in. In some early self-service stores, the dairy case backed directly onto the cold storage room, so that clerks could restock it from behind without ever entering the sales floor. The placement, in other words, was settled for practical reasons before anyone had studied how shoppers move.

4That study came later, and it has given the popular explanation some real support. Researchers who track shoppers’ paths, sometimes by following them with a clipboard and sometimes by attaching small sensors to carts, have found that most people do not walk every aisle, even when they have plenty of time. Instead, they tend to circle the outer edge of the store, where fresh foods are usually kept, and dip into only a few of the center aisles. Shoppers who make a quick trip for one or two items often spend more than they planned, and stores are well aware of it. Some managers say that once they understood these patterns, they placed new products and seasonal displays along the route to the dairy case on purpose.

5So which explanation is right? The fairest answer is that the two describe different moments. The delivery account explains why milk ended up in the back in the first place; the shopping account explains why stores have little reason to move it now. A layout chosen for the convenience of workers turned out to suit the store’s sales as well, and a business seldom changes an arrangement that serves it twice.

6The case of the milk carries a broader lesson about explanations of this kind. When a pattern benefits someone, it is natural to assume it was designed for that benefit. Sometimes it was. Often, though, the benefit was discovered after the fact, and the pattern was first shaped by something far less interesting, such as where the trucks happened to park. Asking where a pattern began, and not only whom it helps, is often the quickest way to tell the two cases apart.

According to paragraphs 1 and 2, people who have worked in the grocery business regard the shoppers’ explanation for the milk’s location as:

  1. completely mistaken, since milk is placed only where deliveries can reach it fastest.
  2. incomplete, since it leaves out how milk is delivered and kept cold.Answer
  3. correct, since managers admit to placing displays on purpose.
  4. proven, since studies show that shoppers circle the outer edge of the store.

How to solve it

  1. The stem names a group and two paragraphs. Find the group’s signal phrase: “according to many people who have worked in the grocery business.”
  2. Their verdict is “only part of the story”: not wrong, but not complete.
  3. B matches that verdict and names the missing part from paragraph 2. A is too extreme, and C and D borrow evidence from paragraph 4.

Why each choice is right or wrong

  • A. Incorrect. This is too extreme. The insiders call the shoppers’ explanation “only part of the story,” not wrong.
  • B. Correct. Paragraph 1 says that, “according to many people who have worked in the grocery business,” the shoppers’ explanation is “only part of the story,” and paragraph 2 supplies the missing part: “Their version begins with the delivery truck.”
  • C. Incorrect. Managers placing displays “on purpose” appears in paragraph 4, and they did so only “once they understood these patterns.” That is not the insiders’ verdict in paragraphs 1 and 2.
  • D. Incorrect. The shopper-tracking studies are in paragraph 4 and come from researchers, not from the grocery workers in paragraphs 1 and 2.

Trap Rereading instead of mapping

The biggest time loss on a passage set is rereading whole paragraphs for each question. If you catch yourself reading paragraph 2 for the third time, your map is too thin: add a tag and a few words, and then trust it.

The second loss is a long debate between two close choices. Go back to the lines, find the one word that separates the choices (only part, completely, first), and decide.